
What makes it worse, it that everyone has been so cringeingly oblivious and manipulable.
The media, right-wing in its vast majority, have cynically propagated myths about the Mayorship of London, telling everyone that:
a) the Mayorship is irrelevant and purely symbolic.
b) Ken Livingstone is corrupt - with articles by Andrew Gilligan tiptoeing precariously between investigative journalism and mud-slinging libel.
c) Boris Johnson is anything other than a clueless puppet of Tory HQ and their campaign team.
But, of course, Londoners haven't noticed this - reading between the lines not being our strong point evidently. No-one noticed that the Evening Standard hadn't officially endorsed a candidate while it laid into Ken Livingstone so voraciously - despite the fact that electoral rules and industry regulations demand that the press provide balanced coverage of an election unless they are officially supporting one candidate over another.
And so people just lapped it all up like obedient sheepdogs, put their X wherever they were told, and danced behind Boris Johnson all the way to Hamlin.
People's itsy-bitsy attention spans had got bored of Ken Livingstone. Never mind his successes as Mayor or the remarkable creation of the first city government in the capital for 14 years. Because he doesn't have a silly haircut or make amusing racist remarks. You could see in his victory speech that even Boris Johnson felt a bit guilty.
"It's a protest vote!" they cry. The Labour government at the moment are stumbling punch-drunk and clueless and people have expressed their protest at that fact, which is more than understandable. Democracy is about change and about registering the desire for change. But not change for change's sake, surely? Some 69,710 people voted for the British National Party! It beggars belief. Can you not see shades of Germany 1933 - as the democrats jostle for elbow-room in the middle-ground, the extremists clear their throats in the wings... Ok, it probably (or at least hopefully) doesn't represent quite so catastrophic a sea-change as that, but the exaggeration is justified.
Ultimately it has been a smart move for the Tories. They know full well that they don't have the substance or political acumen to provide a viable alternative to Labour's considerable shortcomings, and so chose as their Mayoral candidate the one man for whom substance and political acumen are mere sideshows in his circus of buffoonery. Never mind that the Tories have not suggested any tangible solutions to the crises being faced in the UK at the moment, as long as David Cameron can smile smugly and rub his hands in glee, he can continue to make a mockery of democracy in London. He would rather inherit a country in tatters than see things turned around in the here and now.
Paul Merton summed it up rather well on this evening's Have I Got News For You. He said of Boris Johnson: "It's just a disaster isn't it? If he wins he's going to go off and do something surprising and extraordinary and people are going to go: 'Oh no, he's a fucking idiot'."
Ah well. I never thought I'd be ashamed to be a Londoner. But there you go.
Let us all raise a glass of Etonian port to a future of politics dominated by platitudes, celebrity, and a modicum of common-sense conspicious only by its absence.


